I should like to enlist (no pun intended) the advice of the
other 'boxers here regarding a question of signature stamp propriety:
When I first started letterboxing (in May), I carved my first stamp
from a very old hard-rubber eraser (the only easer I could find at
the moment). My tools and my techniques (like my materials) really
weren't top-notch at the time. This little 'prototype' was actually
used in five boxes (two found, and three planted).
About a month later, I managed to aquire some lovely art-gum erasers
(the little cubic ones), and practiced my carving until I had a new
stamp - of greater quality in terms of image and material - than the
first. You will note, though, that the image on the new stamp was
different from the one on the first! I (hesitantly) began to use this
new stamp. I've used it now for nine other boxes (three my own, six
found).
Now, I've recently procured a block of marvelous Stradlaeter master-
carve and a very handy new x-acto knife. In addition, my skills at
carving have advanced again. Here's the question: can I change
signature stamps yet again? The image between stamp #2 and stamp #3
(the new mastercarve one) will be nearly the same, but the new one
will be larger and more detailed. I always print my pseudonym in the
logbook as well, so the connection can still be made! Please don't
think that I intend to change signature stamps every few weeks -
indeed, I'm hoping that this new one will be the last.
I would very much like for my signature stamp to reflect a certain
aesthetic standard and ability, but I'd hate to commit a letterboxing
faux pas (plus I'd like to know how everyone feels about this!).
Thanks in advance,
Megan
"Shipwright"
Sig. Stamp Question
20 messages in this thread |
Started on 2002-09-01
Sig. Stamp Question
From: shipwright17 (shipwright@myrealbox.com) |
Date: 2002-09-01 21:52:37 UTC
Re: [LbNA] Sig. Stamp Question
From: (boatsing@msn.com) |
Date: 2002-09-01 18:14:24 UTC-04:00
I understand what you mean, I have a stamp that is primative at best, being the first try. I have been using it now for 6 months, but have a new one planned with my wife and I reach 100 finds. The theme will remain though, that is probably the important part.
Bob & Carolyn
Boatsing/Voyageur
----- Original Message -----From: shipwright17Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 5:52 PMTo: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.comSubject: [LbNA] Sig. Stamp QuestionI should like to enlist (no pun intended) the advice of the
other 'boxers here regarding a question of signature stamp propriety:
When I first started letterboxing (in May), I carved my first stamp
from a very old hard-rubber eraser (the only easer I could find at
the moment). My tools and my techniques (like my materials) really
weren't top-notch at the time. This little 'prototype' was actually
used in five boxes (two found, and three planted).
About a month later, I managed to aquire some lovely art-gum erasers
(the little cubic ones), and practiced my carving until I had a new
stamp - of greater quality in terms of image and material - than the
first. You will note, though, that the image on the new stamp was
different from the one on the first! I (hesitantly) began to use this
new stamp. I've used it now for nine other boxes (three my own, six
found).
Now, I've recently procured a block of marvelous Stradlaeter master-
carve and a very handy new x-acto knife. In addition, my skills at
carving have advanced again. Here's the question: can I change
signature stamps yet again? The image between stamp #2 and stamp #3
(the new mastercarve one) will be nearly the same, but the new one
will be larger and more detailed. I always print my pseudonym in the
logbook as well, so the connection can still be made! Please don't
think that I intend to change signature stamps every few weeks -
indeed, I'm hoping that this new one will be the last.
I would very much like for my signature stamp to reflect a certain
aesthetic standard and ability, but I'd hate to commit a letterboxing
faux pas (plus I'd like to know how everyone feels about this!).
Thanks in advance,
Megan
"Shipwright"
To unsubscribe: mailto:letterbox-usa-unsubscribe@egroups.com
List info, archives, etc: http://www.letterboxing.org/list.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [LbNA] Sig. Stamp Question
From: Tig (mainetig@yahoo.com) |
Date: 2002-09-01 15:41:09 UTC-07:00
There is no reason why you can't change your sig stamp. In fact, many
have over the years - or mearly carved new renditions as their carving
techniques have matured. If you wish to carve a new stamp - or even
change your stamp all together - Go For It!
One thing I have seen in some logs, is that once a new stamp has been
carved by a boxer - especially if it is a new image all together - they
have returned to boxes they found with their original stamp and
re-stamped in with their new image. No, it doesn't count as another
find - but it can be a great excuse to go revisit some of your favorite
boxes ;o).
Enjoy, and happy boxin'!!
Tig
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com
have over the years - or mearly carved new renditions as their carving
techniques have matured. If you wish to carve a new stamp - or even
change your stamp all together - Go For It!
One thing I have seen in some logs, is that once a new stamp has been
carved by a boxer - especially if it is a new image all together - they
have returned to boxes they found with their original stamp and
re-stamped in with their new image. No, it doesn't count as another
find - but it can be a great excuse to go revisit some of your favorite
boxes ;o).
Enjoy, and happy boxin'!!
Tig
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com
Re: Sig. Stamp Question
From: stampcramp (stampcramp@yahoo.com) |
Date: 2002-09-01 22:43:52 UTC
I am still very much a newbie to this hobby, and just recently carved
my first eraser. It was not a huge success--and I hope with more
practice I will improve. I definitely think the sig stamp should
evolve as expertise, life of the eraser, etc. demand. I am still
horrified by the fact that when I found my first boxes I actually
signed my "real" name rather than my pseudonym.
my first eraser. It was not a huge success--and I hope with more
practice I will improve. I definitely think the sig stamp should
evolve as expertise, life of the eraser, etc. demand. I am still
horrified by the fact that when I found my first boxes I actually
signed my "real" name rather than my pseudonym.
Re: [LbNA] Sig. Stamp Question
From: (motofranz@webtv.net) |
Date: 2002-09-01 18:46:52 UTC-04:00
I have used about 6 different signature stamps because I might do a
series of boxes by one person. I like to mix it up a bit. The box owner
won't get bored with the same sig stamps in his/her letterbox !
JMHO,
franzsolo...
<> plus I like to carve 'em <>
P75F86X5E0
series of boxes by one person. I like to mix it up a bit. The box owner
won't get bored with the same sig stamps in his/her letterbox !
JMHO,
franzsolo...
<> plus I like to carve 'em <>
P75F86X5E0
Re: [LbNA] Sig. Stamp Question
From: Chuck Straub (woodschuckstraub@yahoo.com) |
Date: 2002-09-01 16:53:31 UTC-07:00
You can change your personal stamp as often as you like. This is an informal group and no real set rules. I would think your happiness with the stamp is more important than what anyone else thinks. Using the same name with the various stamps will help a lot to tell people that it's the same person with a new stamp. Change your stamp so you can get exactly what you like and happy letterboxing..Chuck & Molly P40 F176 X43
shipwright17
I should like to enlist (no pun intended) the advice of the
other 'boxers here regarding a question of signature stamp propriety:
When I first started letterboxing (in May), I carved my first stamp
from a very old hard-rubber eraser (the only easer I could find at
the moment). My tools and my techniques (like my materials) really
weren't top-notch at the time. This little 'prototype' was actually
used in five boxes (two found, and three planted).
About a month later, I managed to aquire some lovely art-gum erasers
(the little cubic ones), and practiced my carving until I had a new
stamp - of greater quality in terms of image and material - than the
first. You will note, though, that the image on the new stamp was
different from the one on the first! I (hesitantly) began to use this
new stamp. I've used it now for nine other boxes (three my own, six
found).
Now, I've recently procured a block of marvelous Stradlaeter master-
carve and a very handy new x-acto knife. In addition, my skills at
carving have advanced again. Here's the question: can I change
signature stamps yet again? The image between stamp #2 and stamp #3
(the new mastercarve one) will be nearly the same, but the new one
will be larger and more detailed. I always print my pseudonym in the
logbook as well, so the connection can still be made! Please don't
think that I intend to change signature stamps every few weeks -
indeed, I'm hoping that this new one will be the last.
I would very much like for my signature stamp to reflect a certain
aesthetic standard and ability, but I'd hate to commit a letterboxing
faux pas (plus I'd like to know how everyone feels about this!).
Thanks in advance,
Megan
"Shipwright"
To unsubscribe: mailto:letterbox-usa-unsubscribe@egroups.com
List info, archives, etc: http://www.letterboxing.org/list.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
Re: [LbNA] Re: Sig. Stamp Question
From: Chuck Straub (woodschuckstraub@yahoo.com) |
Date: 2002-09-01 17:00:22 UTC-07:00
I have and still do sign my real name in boxes. Most times I shorten it to my first name only. As I see it, I don't care who knows I letterbox and am not ashamed of what I am doing so why not. That however is up to each person to decide. I see nothing wrong with either way. I am actually getting fairly well known as.....Chuck & Molly P40 F176 X43
stampcramp
I am still very much a newbie to this hobby, and just recently carved
my first eraser. It was not a huge success--and I hope with more
practice I will improve. I definitely think the sig stamp should
evolve as expertise, life of the eraser, etc. demand. I am still
horrified by the fact that when I found my first boxes I actually
signed my "real" name rather than my pseudonym.
To unsubscribe: mailto:letterbox-usa-unsubscribe@egroups.com
List info, archives, etc: http://www.letterboxing.org/list.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
Re: [LbNA] Sig. Stamp Question
From: Chris Hubbard (blndbuck@sover.net) |
Date: 2002-09-01 20:48:27 UTC-04:00
I've changed my stamp from the first one, and I know I'll change it again.
The first time I went out and found a box (this summer), I had a
commercially made stamp, so that's what I stamped into the box I found.
Then, I figured out what I wanted for a "trail name," so I carved a stamp to
reflect that. Now that I've carved a few stamps and am finding what kind of
carving material I like, I will probably end up carving a better signature
stamp, still reflecting my trail name. I, too, like to sign my name and
date, so that stays consistant. Just like you, I don't know if it's a faux
pas, but I'd rather been happy with the stamp I use rather than be "stuck"
with one I'm not all that happy about! -Kittlekatz
----- Original Message -----
From: "shipwright17"
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 5:52 PM
Subject: [LbNA] Sig. Stamp Question
> I should like to enlist (no pun intended) the advice of the
> other 'boxers here regarding a question of signature stamp propriety:
>
> When I first started letterboxing (in May), I carved my first stamp
> from a very old hard-rubber eraser (the only easer I could find at
> the moment). My tools and my techniques (like my materials) really
> weren't top-notch at the time. This little 'prototype' was actually
> used in five boxes (two found, and three planted).
>
> About a month later, I managed to aquire some lovely art-gum erasers
> (the little cubic ones), and practiced my carving until I had a new
> stamp - of greater quality in terms of image and material - than the
> first. You will note, though, that the image on the new stamp was
> different from the one on the first! I (hesitantly) began to use this
> new stamp. I've used it now for nine other boxes (three my own, six
> found).
>
> Now, I've recently procured a block of marvelous Stradlaeter master-
> carve and a very handy new x-acto knife. In addition, my skills at
> carving have advanced again. Here's the question: can I change
> signature stamps yet again? The image between stamp #2 and stamp #3
> (the new mastercarve one) will be nearly the same, but the new one
> will be larger and more detailed. I always print my pseudonym in the
> logbook as well, so the connection can still be made! Please don't
> think that I intend to change signature stamps every few weeks -
> indeed, I'm hoping that this new one will be the last.
>
> I would very much like for my signature stamp to reflect a certain
> aesthetic standard and ability, but I'd hate to commit a letterboxing
> faux pas (plus I'd like to know how everyone feels about this!).
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Megan
> "Shipwright"
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe: mailto:letterbox-usa-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List info, archives, etc: http://www.letterboxing.org/list.html
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
The first time I went out and found a box (this summer), I had a
commercially made stamp, so that's what I stamped into the box I found.
Then, I figured out what I wanted for a "trail name," so I carved a stamp to
reflect that. Now that I've carved a few stamps and am finding what kind of
carving material I like, I will probably end up carving a better signature
stamp, still reflecting my trail name. I, too, like to sign my name and
date, so that stays consistant. Just like you, I don't know if it's a faux
pas, but I'd rather been happy with the stamp I use rather than be "stuck"
with one I'm not all that happy about! -Kittlekatz
----- Original Message -----
From: "shipwright17"
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 5:52 PM
Subject: [LbNA] Sig. Stamp Question
> I should like to enlist (no pun intended) the advice of the
> other 'boxers here regarding a question of signature stamp propriety:
>
> When I first started letterboxing (in May), I carved my first stamp
> from a very old hard-rubber eraser (the only easer I could find at
> the moment). My tools and my techniques (like my materials) really
> weren't top-notch at the time. This little 'prototype' was actually
> used in five boxes (two found, and three planted).
>
> About a month later, I managed to aquire some lovely art-gum erasers
> (the little cubic ones), and practiced my carving until I had a new
> stamp - of greater quality in terms of image and material - than the
> first. You will note, though, that the image on the new stamp was
> different from the one on the first! I (hesitantly) began to use this
> new stamp. I've used it now for nine other boxes (three my own, six
> found).
>
> Now, I've recently procured a block of marvelous Stradlaeter master-
> carve and a very handy new x-acto knife. In addition, my skills at
> carving have advanced again. Here's the question: can I change
> signature stamps yet again? The image between stamp #2 and stamp #3
> (the new mastercarve one) will be nearly the same, but the new one
> will be larger and more detailed. I always print my pseudonym in the
> logbook as well, so the connection can still be made! Please don't
> think that I intend to change signature stamps every few weeks -
> indeed, I'm hoping that this new one will be the last.
>
> I would very much like for my signature stamp to reflect a certain
> aesthetic standard and ability, but I'd hate to commit a letterboxing
> faux pas (plus I'd like to know how everyone feels about this!).
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Megan
> "Shipwright"
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe: mailto:letterbox-usa-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List info, archives, etc: http://www.letterboxing.org/list.html
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
Re: [LbNA] Sig. Stamp Question
From: (paisleyorca@webtv.net) |
Date: 2002-09-01 18:41:20 UTC-07:00
Hey Shipwreck!
Go ahead and change your signature stamp if you'd like. At least I
don't mind. A couple people out here have changed their signature
stamps after they've hit the 100 mark, so I think you're free to do as
you please.
My mate originally used a commercial stamp until he found an image he
liked that he had me carve for him. Probably others do the same type of
thing until they find an "identity" or better stamp that suits them
best.
Best regards,
Amanda Briles
The Paisley Orca
Go ahead and change your signature stamp if you'd like. At least I
don't mind. A couple people out here have changed their signature
stamps after they've hit the 100 mark, so I think you're free to do as
you please.
My mate originally used a commercial stamp until he found an image he
liked that he had me carve for him. Probably others do the same type of
thing until they find an "identity" or better stamp that suits them
best.
Best regards,
Amanda Briles
The Paisley Orca
Re: [LbNA] Sig. Stamp Question
From: short spike (spike_678@yahoo.com) |
Date: 2002-09-01 19:30:06 UTC-07:00
i plan to soon change my sig stamp- i have discovered
the material i used tends to crumble horribly. as for
repeating the exact image... nah, might have some fun
with it. and as long as you arent doing anything
wrong, where is the problem in signing your real name?
this is a clean wholesome sport and lists arent being
sold to telemarketers...
fun stamping!
spike
--- Tig wrote:
> There is no reason why you can't change your sig
> stamp. In fact, many
> have over the years - or mearly carved new
> renditions as their carving
> techniques have matured. If you wish to carve a new
> stamp - or even
> change your stamp all together - Go For It!
>
> One thing I have seen in some logs, is that once a
> new stamp has been
> carved by a boxer - especially if it is a new image
> all together - they
> have returned to boxes they found with their
> original stamp and
> re-stamped in with their new image. No, it doesn't
> count as another
> find - but it can be a great excuse to go revisit
> some of your favorite
> boxes ;o).
>
> Enjoy, and happy boxin'!!
>
> Tig
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
> http://finance.yahoo.com
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com
the material i used tends to crumble horribly. as for
repeating the exact image... nah, might have some fun
with it. and as long as you arent doing anything
wrong, where is the problem in signing your real name?
this is a clean wholesome sport and lists arent being
sold to telemarketers...
fun stamping!
spike
--- Tig
> There is no reason why you can't change your sig
> stamp. In fact, many
> have over the years - or mearly carved new
> renditions as their carving
> techniques have matured. If you wish to carve a new
> stamp - or even
> change your stamp all together - Go For It!
>
> One thing I have seen in some logs, is that once a
> new stamp has been
> carved by a boxer - especially if it is a new image
> all together - they
> have returned to boxes they found with their
> original stamp and
> re-stamped in with their new image. No, it doesn't
> count as another
> find - but it can be a great excuse to go revisit
> some of your favorite
> boxes ;o).
>
> Enjoy, and happy boxin'!!
>
> Tig
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
> http://finance.yahoo.com
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com
Sig. Stamp Question
From: lizardbuttsfamily (mmebt@hotmail.com) |
Date: 2002-09-02 06:52:24 UTC
Great! My first was a commercially made job. My present one is a very
crude one, which I love dearly. I plan on having a couple of
signature stamps for the microbox logs that I run across. I always
wondered how one would stamp into a microbox's log with a big
signature stamp.
Monica
crude one, which I love dearly. I plan on having a couple of
signature stamps for the microbox logs that I run across. I always
wondered how one would stamp into a microbox's log with a big
signature stamp.
Monica
Re: Sig. Stamp Question
From: dvn2rckr (dvn2rckr@yahoo.com) |
Date: 2002-09-02 16:04:33 UTC
I've recently placed many microboxes in the Pacific Northwest
(they're MUCH easier to hide in tiny nooks & crannies) and my hope
is that those letterboxers who have larger signature stamps merely
stamp a portion (perhaps the most 'essential' part) of their stamp's
image into the log when they find the box.
dvn2r ckr
F46P15X5
--- In letterbox-usa@y..., "lizardbuttsfamily" wrote:
> Great! My first was a commercially made job. My present one is a
very
> crude one, which I love dearly. I plan on having a couple of
> signature stamps for the microbox logs that I run across. I always
> wondered how one would stamp into a microbox's log with a big
> signature stamp.
>
>
> Monica
(they're MUCH easier to hide in tiny nooks & crannies) and my hope
is that those letterboxers who have larger signature stamps merely
stamp a portion (perhaps the most 'essential' part) of their stamp's
image into the log when they find the box.
dvn2r ckr
F46P15X5
--- In letterbox-usa@y..., "lizardbuttsfamily"
> Great! My first was a commercially made job. My present one is a
very
> crude one, which I love dearly. I plan on having a couple of
> signature stamps for the microbox logs that I run across. I always
> wondered how one would stamp into a microbox's log with a big
> signature stamp.
>
>
> Monica
Re: Sig. Stamp Question
From: dvn2rckr (dvn2rckr@yahoo.com) |
Date: 2002-09-02 16:10:28 UTC
Oh--I forgot to mention that I prefer the (ranging from rudimentary
to exquisite) homemade stamps to commercially created ones. I think
I like the fact that somebody took the time to create the stamp.
You really gain an appreciation for the skill that is displayed in
the very detailed images. As for my carving/artistic skills, let's
say I'm still working on it... ;)
dvn2r ckr
F46P15X5
--- In letterbox-usa@y..., "lizardbuttsfamily" wrote:
> Great! My first was a commercially made job. My present one is a
very
> crude one, which I love dearly. I plan on having a couple of
> signature stamps for the microbox logs that I run across. I always
> wondered how one would stamp into a microbox's log with a big
> signature stamp.
>
>
> Monica
to exquisite) homemade stamps to commercially created ones. I think
I like the fact that somebody took the time to create the stamp.
You really gain an appreciation for the skill that is displayed in
the very detailed images. As for my carving/artistic skills, let's
say I'm still working on it... ;)
dvn2r ckr
F46P15X5
--- In letterbox-usa@y..., "lizardbuttsfamily"
> Great! My first was a commercially made job. My present one is a
very
> crude one, which I love dearly. I plan on having a couple of
> signature stamps for the microbox logs that I run across. I always
> wondered how one would stamp into a microbox's log with a big
> signature stamp.
>
>
> Monica
Re: Sig. Stamp Question
From: lizardbuttsfamily (mmebt@hotmail.com) |
Date: 2002-09-02 22:01:08 UTC
They say practice makes perfect, but I don't think that will help in
my case. I do know that if I am still letterboxing at age 80 plus
that my kids or grandkids will do the carving for me. 2042 Wow!
Monica
F lost count P3
"dvn2rckr" wrote:
As for my carving/artistic skills, let's
> say I'm still working on it... ;)
>
> dvn2r ckr
> F46P15X5
>
my case. I do know that if I am still letterboxing at age 80 plus
that my kids or grandkids will do the carving for me. 2042 Wow!
Monica
F lost count P3
"dvn2rckr"
As for my carving/artistic skills, let's
> say I'm still working on it... ;)
>
> dvn2r ckr
> F46P15X5
>
Re: Sig. Stamp Question
From: funhog1 (funhog@pacifier.com) |
Date: 2002-09-17 18:53:27 UTC
Remember: there are no rules.
I've changed my stamp after finding 100 boxes and am about to do so
again. This time, not because I hit another century mark but because
I had to leave town unexpectedly without my logbook or stamp in
hand. I do have my carving tools and media with me. Anticipating a
possible letterboxing opportunity, I carved a new stamp. Funhog
I've changed my stamp after finding 100 boxes and am about to do so
again. This time, not because I hit another century mark but because
I had to leave town unexpectedly without my logbook or stamp in
hand. I do have my carving tools and media with me. Anticipating a
possible letterboxing opportunity, I carved a new stamp. Funhog
Re: Sig. Stamp Question
From: lizardbuttsfamily (mmebt@hotmail.com) |
Date: 2002-09-17 19:58:52 UTC
Hee Hee, We will be there!
Lizardbutt has gathered up all of his stamps, which is a total of
four. He reminded me that he carved one of them himself. He used a
pencil for the carving tool.
Bookworm has her collection, which is very impressive.
I'm so excited that I just can't hide it....
Monica
F9 P3 X0 (soon to change) HH0 E0 ET0 V0 L a googol
> Remember: there are no rules.
>
> I've changed my stamp after finding 100 boxes and am about to do so
> again. This time, not because I hit another century mark but
because
> I had to leave town unexpectedly without my logbook or stamp in
> hand. I do have my carving tools and media with me. Anticipating a
> possible letterboxing opportunity, I carved a new stamp. Funhog
Lizardbutt has gathered up all of his stamps, which is a total of
four. He reminded me that he carved one of them himself. He used a
pencil for the carving tool.
Bookworm has her collection, which is very impressive.
I'm so excited that I just can't hide it....
Monica
F9 P3 X0 (soon to change) HH0 E0 ET0 V0 L a googol
> Remember: there are no rules.
>
> I've changed my stamp after finding 100 boxes and am about to do so
> again. This time, not because I hit another century mark but
because
> I had to leave town unexpectedly without my logbook or stamp in
> hand. I do have my carving tools and media with me. Anticipating a
> possible letterboxing opportunity, I carved a new stamp. Funhog
Re: Sig. Stamp Question
From: psycomommy2003 (ktborrelli@hotmail.com) |
Date: 2002-09-17 21:22:32 UTC
-- I recogonize the feeling! Congrats on your first exchange! Funny
how something so small can make you feel like a kid again at
Christmas.
And you'll remember it like a "first kiss"!
KTB
p.s. just noticed your 0 count for ET's fly back and do my Sheep
Series
- In letterbox-usa@y..., "lizardbuttsfamily" wrote:
> Hee Hee, We will be there!
> Lizardbutt has gathered up all of his stamps, which is a total of
> four. He reminded me that he carved one of them himself. He used a
> pencil for the carving tool.
> Bookworm has her collection, which is very impressive.
>
> I'm so excited that I just can't hide it....
>
> Monica
> F9 P3 X0 (soon to change) HH0 E0 ET0 V0 L a googol
>
> > Remember: there are no rules.
> >
> > I've changed my stamp after finding 100 boxes and am about to do
so
> > again. This time, not because I hit another century mark but
> because
> > I had to leave town unexpectedly without my logbook or stamp in
> > hand. I do have my carving tools and media with me. Anticipating
a
> > possible letterboxing opportunity, I carved a new stamp. Funhog
how something so small can make you feel like a kid again at
Christmas.
And you'll remember it like a "first kiss"!
KTB
p.s. just noticed your 0 count for ET's fly back and do my Sheep
Series
- In letterbox-usa@y..., "lizardbuttsfamily"
> Hee Hee, We will be there!
> Lizardbutt has gathered up all of his stamps, which is a total of
> four. He reminded me that he carved one of them himself. He used a
> pencil for the carving tool.
> Bookworm has her collection, which is very impressive.
>
> I'm so excited that I just can't hide it....
>
> Monica
> F9 P3 X0 (soon to change) HH0 E0 ET0 V0 L a googol
>
> > Remember: there are no rules.
> >
> > I've changed my stamp after finding 100 boxes and am about to do
so
> > again. This time, not because I hit another century mark but
> because
> > I had to leave town unexpectedly without my logbook or stamp in
> > hand. I do have my carving tools and media with me. Anticipating
a
> > possible letterboxing opportunity, I carved a new stamp. Funhog
Re: Sig. Stamp Question
From: teammaddawg (teammaddawg@yahoo.com) |
Date: 2002-09-17 21:33:27 UTC
Obviously I've missed a new number to track - what is an "ET"?
Cheryl
The Mad Dawgs
> p.s. just noticed your 0 count for ET's fly back and do my Sheep
> Series
Cheryl
The Mad Dawgs
> p.s. just noticed your 0 count for ET's fly back and do my Sheep
> Series
Re: Sig. Stamp Question
From: psycomommy2003 (ktborrelli@hotmail.com) |
Date: 2002-09-17 21:38:33 UTC
---ET is just a joke - extraterrestrials. You know, like the kind
Team Jeddi look for in Ohio! :-)
In letterbox-usa@y..., "teammaddawg" wrote:
> Obviously I've missed a new number to track - what is an "ET"?
>
> Cheryl
> The Mad Dawgs
>
> > p.s. just noticed your 0 count for ET's fly back and do my Sheep
> > Series
Team Jeddi look for in Ohio! :-)
In letterbox-usa@y..., "teammaddawg"
> Obviously I've missed a new number to track - what is an "ET"?
>
> Cheryl
> The Mad Dawgs
>
> > p.s. just noticed your 0 count for ET's fly back and do my Sheep
> > Series
Re: Sig. Stamp Question
From: adelcoll (adelcoll@yahoo.com) |
Date: 2002-09-18 01:46:31 UTC
I am going through the same process, though I am not so far along.
Like you, for my first stamp I used an eraser I had around the house.
I set to trying to carve with a craft knife.
Once I bought one of those speedball tools and saw how much easier it
made things, I had to replace that initial attempt.
My little cavy still didn't come up as I'd imagined on this 2nd try,
but I was much happier with it. I am sure I will want to try again
when I have gained somemore expertise.
So, I am glad you wrote and I could see all the reassurance that
changing sig. stamps is okay!
adelcoll, cavy lovers
--- In letterbox-usa@y..., "shipwright17" wrote:
> I should like to enlist (no pun intended) the advice of the
> other 'boxers here regarding a question of signature stamp
propriety:
>
> When I first started letterboxing (in May), I carved my first stamp
> from a very old hard-rubber eraser (the only easer I could find at
> the moment). My tools and my techniques (like my materials) really
> weren't top-notch at the time. This little 'prototype' was actually
> used in five boxes (two found, and three planted).
>
> About a month later, I managed to aquire some lovely art-gum
erasers
> (the little cubic ones), and practiced my carving until I had a new
> stamp - of greater quality in terms of image and material - than
the
> first. You will note, though, that the image on the new stamp was
> different from the one on the first! I (hesitantly) began to use
this
> new stamp. I've used it now for nine other boxes (three my own, six
> found).
>
> Now, I've recently procured a block of marvelous Stradlaeter master-
> carve and a very handy new x-acto knife. In addition, my skills at
> carving have advanced again. Here's the question: can I change
> signature stamps yet again? The image between stamp #2 and stamp #3
> (the new mastercarve one) will be nearly the same, but the new one
> will be larger and more detailed. I always print my pseudonym in
the
> logbook as well, so the connection can still be made! Please don't
> think that I intend to change signature stamps every few weeks -
> indeed, I'm hoping that this new one will be the last.
>
> I would very much like for my signature stamp to reflect a certain
> aesthetic standard and ability, but I'd hate to commit a
letterboxing
> faux pas (plus I'd like to know how everyone feels about this!).
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Megan
> "Shipwright"
Like you, for my first stamp I used an eraser I had around the house.
I set to trying to carve with a craft knife.
Once I bought one of those speedball tools and saw how much easier it
made things, I had to replace that initial attempt.
My little cavy still didn't come up as I'd imagined on this 2nd try,
but I was much happier with it. I am sure I will want to try again
when I have gained somemore expertise.
So, I am glad you wrote and I could see all the reassurance that
changing sig. stamps is okay!
adelcoll, cavy lovers
--- In letterbox-usa@y..., "shipwright17"
> I should like to enlist (no pun intended) the advice of the
> other 'boxers here regarding a question of signature stamp
propriety:
>
> When I first started letterboxing (in May), I carved my first stamp
> from a very old hard-rubber eraser (the only easer I could find at
> the moment). My tools and my techniques (like my materials) really
> weren't top-notch at the time. This little 'prototype' was actually
> used in five boxes (two found, and three planted).
>
> About a month later, I managed to aquire some lovely art-gum
erasers
> (the little cubic ones), and practiced my carving until I had a new
> stamp - of greater quality in terms of image and material - than
the
> first. You will note, though, that the image on the new stamp was
> different from the one on the first! I (hesitantly) began to use
this
> new stamp. I've used it now for nine other boxes (three my own, six
> found).
>
> Now, I've recently procured a block of marvelous Stradlaeter master-
> carve and a very handy new x-acto knife. In addition, my skills at
> carving have advanced again. Here's the question: can I change
> signature stamps yet again? The image between stamp #2 and stamp #3
> (the new mastercarve one) will be nearly the same, but the new one
> will be larger and more detailed. I always print my pseudonym in
the
> logbook as well, so the connection can still be made! Please don't
> think that I intend to change signature stamps every few weeks -
> indeed, I'm hoping that this new one will be the last.
>
> I would very much like for my signature stamp to reflect a certain
> aesthetic standard and ability, but I'd hate to commit a
letterboxing
> faux pas (plus I'd like to know how everyone feels about this!).
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Megan
> "Shipwright"